Csl-computer 5711

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemCsl-computer 5711  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A520M-K
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 06:20
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 81.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 702
78% 612 Pts
64-Core 707
44% 707 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.8% Poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 106
Parallax 110
0% 71.8 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 99.4
Splatting 92
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
147GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 255 166 158 158 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 475
Mixed 465
SusWrite 190
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 63.8
214% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 373
281% 376 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 115%
Great: 128%
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
83GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 121 136 137 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 422
Write 138
Mixed 203
SusWrite 134
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 35.2
136% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 159
128% 185 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 77%
Samsung MZNTD128HAGM-00000 128GB
114GB free
Firmware: DXT2300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 128 128 128 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 394
Write 131
Mixed 126
SusWrite 128
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 19.6
105% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 50.2
68% 128 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 68%
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 81GB
73GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 254 159 157 158 148 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.6% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 466
Mixed 445
SusWrite 188
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 45.8
147% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 373
281% 376 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
541GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 91 100 85 88 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 89.3
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GA64D88CX3F-JR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
99% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 33.8
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 29.2
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 99%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4D U28E590
Typical 5711 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

System: Csl-computer 5711

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback