Csl-computer 5711

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCsl-computer 5711  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A520M-K
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220208
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 18:21
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 69.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 268
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 631
69% 546 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.37
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.3% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 104
Parallax 109
90% 108 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 97.3
Splatting 88.6
85% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 429
Write 135
Mixed 205
56% 256 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 30.9
110% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 88.9
95% 161 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 77%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
34GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 498
Write 478
Mixed 460
107% 479 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 50.7
170% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
SSK 240GB
118GB free
Firmware: 1507
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 392
Write 232
Mixed 302
68% 309 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 27.4
98% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 155
131% 191 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 82%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
570GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 105
Write 98.9
Mixed 70.8
68% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 62%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
100GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 265
Write 54.5
Mixed 77.6
129% 132 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.6
305% 6.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GA64D88CX3F-JR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 35.3
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 28.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 59 60 27.5" 2560 1440 SAM0C4D U28E590
Typical 5711 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

System: Csl-computer 5711

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback