Csl-computer 5711

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCsl-computer 5711  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A520M-K
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230814
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 04 '23 at 00:00
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 79%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 81.2
2-Core 156
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 569
52% 437 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.8% Very good
Lighting 110
Reflection 108
Parallax 74.5
90% 97.5 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 0.3
46% 65.3 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
158GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 263 218 152 151 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 465
Mixed 459
SusWrite 204
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 55.7
185% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 364
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 106%
Great: 128%
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
99GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 122 131 128 133 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 416
Write 136
Mixed 200
SusWrite 129
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 31.2
118% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 155
126% 182 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 77%
Samsung MZNTD128HAGM-00000 128GB
114GB free
Firmware: DXT2300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 125 128 129 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 450
Write 133
Mixed 130
SusWrite 127
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 19.2
93% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 53.5
69% 127 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
542GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 85 87 100 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 103
Write 84.4
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 89.7
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 62%
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 81GB
73GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 162 201 137 143 151 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.8% Good
Read 75.7
Write 69.4
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 156
72% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 4.6
677% 3.93 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GA64D88CX3F-JR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 33.3
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4D U28E590
Typical 5711 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

System: Csl-computer 5711

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $324
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback