BOXX APEXX S3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemBOXX APEXX S3  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z370 Taichi
Memory61.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '23 at 22:55
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 270
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 822
80% 657 Pts
64-Core 1,066
66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
PNY(196E 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.5% Average
Lighting 56.4
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 59.4
46% 60.5 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 58
Splatting 52.4
48% 59.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1724 1728 1791 1757 1665 1543 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,143
Write 1,810
Mixed 870
SusWrite 1,701
365% 1,631 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 60.8
201% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 990
DQ Write 667
DQ Mixed 828
618% 828 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 289%
Great: 353%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
402GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 336 340 340 334 339 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 300
Write 339
Mixed 310
SusWrite 338
73% 322 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 48.3
157% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 151
128% 189 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905701-020.A00G 859B CT16G4DFD8266.K16FB 9905701-020.A00G 859B CT16G4DFD8266.K16FB 64GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.8% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 27.7
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 28.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 23.8" 1280 720 SPT09AB Sceptre F24
Typical APEXX S3 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: BOXX APEXX S3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $314
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback