Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU502LW
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210406
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 06 '23 at 20:13
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 240
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 860
79% 663 Pts
64-Core 1,324
82% 1,324 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 174F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3742
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 106
Parallax 120
91% 113 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 103
Splatting 94.5
90% 112 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
581GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 974 1022 1004 1077 1078 1046 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,747
Write 1,264
Mixed 1,261
SusWrite 1,034
297% 1,326 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 52.6
172% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 528
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 508
342% 420 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 203%
Great: 329%
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDB 1TB
418GB free
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 951 858 807 835 833 837 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,223
Write 1,161
Mixed 1,130
SusWrite 853
246% 1,092 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 47.7
155% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 570
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 503
347% 439 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 168%
Great: 230%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
2TB free, PID 0825
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 127 126 128 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 140
Write 138
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 127
138% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
44% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF2G64HZ-3G2B1 Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 22.7
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 24.8
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO31EB
Typical ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW Builds (Compare 1,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback