TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU502LW
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210406
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 08:16
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 236
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 838
78% 651 Pts
64-Core 1,350
84% 1,350 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 90%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 174F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3742
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 108
Parallax 111
94% 112 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 105
Splatting 96.5
91% 113 fps
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 93%
 Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
721GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1142 1223 1293 1354 1338 1344 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,576
Write 1,360
Mixed 1,269
SusWrite 1,282
308% 1,372 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 61.1
200% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 749
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 750
498% 605 MB/s
Poor: 145% ↑
This bench: 227%
 Great: 329%
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDB 1TB
876GB free
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1530 831 827 831 823 835 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,398
Write 1,870
Mixed 1,518
SusWrite 946
324% 1,433 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 59.1
200% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 736
DQ Mixed 811
622% 850 MB/s
Poor: 151% ↑
This bench: 214%
 Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF2G64HZ-3G2B1 Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 23.1
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 23.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 80.4%
 Great: 99%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO31EB
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW Builds (Compare 1,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples1,128x
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples78x
GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 79%, 8,783 samples648x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples548x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples6x
SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1002 1TBWDCBench 224%, 12,046 samples390x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel  $70Bench 191%, 163,917 samples324x
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1002 1TBNvmeBench 182%, 1,280 samples137x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CWE M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GBSamsungBench 90%, 3,469 samples447x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GBMicronBench 90%, 8,060 samples441x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples62x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback