Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU502LW
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '23 at 01:30
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 247
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 866
83% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,281
79% 1,281 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 174F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3742
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.7% Excellent
Lighting 98
Reflection 95.9
Parallax 98.3
80% 97.4 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 93.2
Splatting 85.3
82% 103 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDB 1TB
822GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1297 835 832 846 848 848 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,277
Write 1,334
Mixed 1201
SusWrite 918
266% 1,182 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 57.1
183% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 792
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 749
509% 633 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 190%
Great: 230%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
550GB free
Firmware: EXF7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1468 1515 1493 1439 1453 1453 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,896
Write 1,514
Mixed 1,419
SusWrite 1470
354% 1,575 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 65.7
215% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 835
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 727
498% 627 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 258%
Great: 329%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0825
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 124 127 131 132 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 145
Write 144
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 129
142% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF2G64HZ-3G2B1 Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 23
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 25.5
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 59.3
68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO31EB
Typical ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW Builds (Compare 1,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback