TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU502LW
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210406
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 04:13
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 226
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 799
75% 626 Pts
64-Core 1,260
78% 1,260 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 87.3%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 174F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3742
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 107
Parallax 110
91% 110 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 104
Splatting 94.8
90% 112 fps
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 90.8%
 Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
634GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 785 1203 1291 1148 1378 1375 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,796
Write 1,375
Mixed 1,159
SusWrite 1,197
309% 1,382 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 43.3
149% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 796
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 724
491% 612 MB/s
Poor: 145% ↑
This bench: 216%
 Great: 329%
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDB 1TB
876GB free
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1577 840 843 833 834 833 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1295
Write 1,228
Mixed 1,132
SusWrite 960
260% 1,154 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 19.3
60% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 890
DQ Write 644
DQ Mixed 726
553% 753 MB/s
Poor: 151% ↑
This bench: 163%
 Great: 230%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
2TB free, PID 0825
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 119 125 123 125 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 142
Write 143
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 119
138% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
43% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑
This bench: 48.2%
 Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF2G64HZ-3G2B1 Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.4% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 22.7
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 23.3
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 74.4%
 Great: 99%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO31EB
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW Builds (Compare 1,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples1,128x
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples78x
GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 79%, 8,783 samples648x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples548x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples6x
SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1002 1TBWDCBench 224%, 12,046 samples390x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel  $70Bench 191%, 163,917 samples324x
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1002 1TBNvmeBench 182%, 1,280 samples137x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CWE M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GBSamsungBench 90%, 3,469 samples447x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GBMicronBench 90%, 8,060 samples441x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples62x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback