PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H110M-K (all builds) |
Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210204 |
Uptime | 1.3 Days |
Run Date | Oct 04 '23 at 06:38 |
Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
Run User | MYS-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
71.8%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 125 122 121 118 120 MB/s
|
82.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
59GB free
Firmware: SBFK66B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 370 389 296 102 348 MB/s
|
42.6%
Average
|
|||
Fujitsu F500S 256G 256GB
31GB free
Firmware: S1024A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 115 34 38 45 38 MB/s
|
61.8%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
116GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 102 99 100 99 97 MB/s
|
52.8%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HX421C14FB2/8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
53.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 69 | 57 | 60 | 31.5" | 1280 720 | AIO0320 AIO |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,134x |
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 646x |
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 562x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 850x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 478x |
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 370x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $157 |