Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210204
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateOct 04 '23 at 06:38
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 177
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 554
56% 453 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 41.1
Parallax 38.1
30% 38.8 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 27.4
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 125 122 121 118 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 452
Write 405
Mixed 325
SusWrite 144
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 39.6
131% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 331
250% 337 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 115%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
59GB free
Firmware: SBFK66B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 370 389 296 102 348 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 269
Write 104
Mixed 89.1
SusWrite 296
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 9.7
44% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 14.9
12% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 102%
Fujitsu F500S 256G 256GB
31GB free
Firmware: S1024A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 115 34 38 45 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 449
Write 369
Mixed 340
SusWrite 88.2
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 20.2
95% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 37.6
81% 162 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
116GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 102 99 100 99 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 85.4
Write 101
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 98.5
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX421C14FB2/8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.8% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 AIO0320 AIO
Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,007 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback