Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '23 at 03:57
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User MMR-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 46.6
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 155
49% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 269
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 5912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 5.5
4% 4.63 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 6.9
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qunion 256G 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 212 203 275 278 260 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 341
Write 343
Mixed 305
SusWrite 253
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 9.1
78% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 15.7
52% 114 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
21% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.5
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 100% 1 46 23 60 0" 1280 720 MS_0003 Monitor
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback