Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '17 at 03:12
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 0.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 5
2-Core 9.6
3% 7.3 Pts
4-Core 19.2
8-Core 31
3% 25.1 Pts
64-Core 38.6
2% 38.6 Pts
Poor: 63% Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50% Average
Lighting 61.7
Reflection 66.6
Parallax 59.3
50% 62.5 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 58.6
Splatting 53.8
49% 61.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
391GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.8% Poor
Read 237
Write 193
Mixed 213
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 6.74
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 3.87
18% 5.64 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.1% Above average
Read 234
Write 175
Mixed 184
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 21.3
109% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 15.6
50% 109 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 118%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 102
78% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.19
86% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Performance DDR3 1600 C9 6x2GB
6 of 8 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 5.2
14% 5 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 0.7
SC Mixed 0.5
2% 0.53 GB/s
Latency 577
7% 577 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,069
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback