PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Default string (all builds) |
Motherboard | Default Default string |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180906 |
Uptime | 3 Days |
Run Date | Sep 24 '23 at 17:46 |
Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
83.8%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 4028) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 57 35 90 70 52 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
|||
Jmicron Generic 1TB
203GB free
Firmware: 0215
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 41 40 41 MB/s
|
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
ST950032 5AS 500GB
136GB free, PID 047b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 42 MB/s
|
16.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
417GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 42 42 43 MB/s
|
20.3%
Poor
|
|||
WD Elements 2620 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 18 31 16 21 28 MB/s
|
8.93%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KVR24N17S8/8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.6%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 60 | 23" | 1280 720 | GSM59CA 2D HD LG TV |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 1,028x |
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples | 965x |
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples | 911x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 494x |
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 483x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 463x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |