Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '23 at 20:23
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 92%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A12-8870E R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27% Poor
Memory 39.8
1-Core 45.9
2-Core 60.3
30% 48.7 Pts
4-Core 79.3
8-Core 105
12% 92.1 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.3% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 56.9
Parallax 64.1
33% 53.8 fps
MRender 56.9
Gravity 48.9
Splatting 42.8
40% 49.5 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 122 90 126 87 86 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.2% Below average
Read 283
Write 232
Mixed 189
SusWrite 122
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 14
43% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 126
102% 145 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 89%
Faspeed K5-120G 120GB
93GB free
Firmware: HC1A254P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 180 113 29 56 219 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.2% Below average
Read 263
Write 231
Mixed 177
SusWrite 133
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 6.6
37% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 17.6
45% 92.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Ramsta-2666MHz-8G MSD48G26Q3 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 8.6
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 0.7
SC Mixed 1.3
4% 1.43 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 27 4 60 20" 1280 720 XVO2213 X2005EW
Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $333
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback