Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 04:45
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A12-8870E R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Memory 39.1
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 98.1
35% 62.3 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 116
19% 134 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.Q4
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.9% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 63.8
33% 54.3 fps
MRender 58.1
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 43.7
41% 51 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 70 129 68 61 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 373
Write 340
Mixed 288
SusWrite 103
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 24
80% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 150
137% 211 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 89%
Faspeed K5-120G 120GB
27GB free
Firmware: HC1A254P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 286 288 148 36 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 293
Write 312
Mixed 230
SusWrite 176
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 6.9
38% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 17.8
52% 108 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Ramsta-2666MHz-8G MSD48G26Q3 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.8% Poor
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 12.6
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 4.6
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $333
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback