Biostar A320MH

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago.

Motherboard	Biostar A320MH (all builds)
Memory	7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '23 at 20:34
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	96%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A12-8870E R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G 81 User benchmarks, average bench 39% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Memory 28.4 1-Core 33.8 2-Core 46.6 22% 36.3 Pts	4-Core 28.2 8-Core 118 8% 72.8 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP 38,816 User benchmarks, average bench 41% AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.7% Below average	Lighting 42.2 Reflection 58.3 Parallax 71.8 34% 57.4 fps	MRender 58.3 Gravity 51.9 Splatting 43.5 41% 51.2 fps
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB 13,649 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RI SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 137 103 97 136 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 304 Write 294 Mixed 257 SusWrite 134 56% 247 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 28.8 4K Mixed 15 60% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 165 138% 200 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 89%
Faspeed K5-120G 120GB 328 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 93GB free Firmware: HC1A254P SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 244 246 222 39 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 295 Write 261 Mixed 244 SusWrite 167 54% 242 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 7.8 48% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 17.3 52% 109 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Ramsta-2666MHz-8G MSD48G26Q3 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.2% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 7.8 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 2.8 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 5: 0P 0R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
5%	19%	16	166	15	60	20"	1280 720	XVO2213 X2005EW

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	266x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	196x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	127x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	129x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	125x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	112x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	115x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	77x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	47x

RAM
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 40,300 samples	48x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	44x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBTeamBench 78%, 7,481 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $333

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16