Thunderobot 911AirX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemThunderobot 911AirX  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT NLAK
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230309
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 10:46
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 63.6
1-Core 159
2-Core 325
94% 183 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 945
94% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,129
70% 1,129 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Quanta(152D 1384) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 13.1
9% 14 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 10.8
12% 15 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-8D512 512GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EV22102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 352 281 329 266 245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,824
Write 454
Mixed 532
SusWrite 302
169% 778 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 17
139% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 885
DQ Write 497
DQ Mixed 312
333% 564 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 162%
Great: 319%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 34.1
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 21.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 10 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0910
Typical 911AirX Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Thunderobot 911AirX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback