Thunderobot 911MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemThunderobot 911MT  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT V158PNX-HL
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220215
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 24 '23 at 07:27
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 65.8
1-Core 137
2-Core 242
80% 148 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 588
61% 490 Pts
64-Core 946
58% 946 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 0156) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3598
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.4% Good
Lighting 80.7
Reflection 101
Parallax 76
66% 85.8 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 57.8
Splatting 57
50% 62 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-8D512 512GB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EV22101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 364 427 390 395 414 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,887
Write 468
Mixed 551
SusWrite 394
180% 825 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 19.1
116% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 500
DQ Write 498
DQ Mixed 312
286% 437 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 155%
Great: 319%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 34.5
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 21.6
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 911MT Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Thunderobot 911MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback