Thunderobot 911AirX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemThunderobot 911AirX  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT NLAK
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '22 at 05:51
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 71.2
1-Core 182
2-Core 351
105% 201 Pts
4-Core 633
8-Core 963
99% 798 Pts
64-Core 1,223
76% 1,223 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Quanta(152D 1384) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
7.52% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 77.8
Parallax 9.6
7% 31.9 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 2
9% 12.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.52%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-8D512 512GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EV22102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1446 1663 1690 1873 1906 1640 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2433
Write 1,797
Mixed 1541
SusWrite 1703
418% 1,868 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 42.2
229% 93 MB/s
DQ Read 1,264
DQ Write 1,014
DQ Mixed 759
671% 1012 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 319%
Great: 319%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 34.2
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 26.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 911AirX Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Thunderobot 911AirX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback