Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC)  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 05:15
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 288
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 880
88% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,059
66% 1,059 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.76% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 10
7% 9.9 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 13.4
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.76%
Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87B8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Lighting 239
Reflection 211
Parallax 203
194% 217 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 154
Splatting 135
129% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 158%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGP31-1000GM-2 1TB
206GB free
Firmware: 41060C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1207 766 749 669 658 635 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,412
Write 2,224
Mixed 1,601
SusWrite 780
392% 1,754 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 70.6
228% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 507
DQ Mixed 717
519% 679 MB/s
Poor: 181%
This bench: 245%
Great: 414%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1681 1670 1646 1586 1567 1483 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,403
Write 1,785
Mixed 918
SusWrite 1,605
374% 1,678 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 59.5
201% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 846
DQ Write 686
DQ Mixed 719
551% 750 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 291%
Great: 353%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
252GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 472 471 463 428 283 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 450
Mixed 429
SusWrite 431
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 44.3
146% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190
785GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 916 507 508 509 508 461 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 4000 C16 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
114% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 33.7
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 49.9
SC Mixed 32.7
100% 35.2 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 114%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 24" 1280 720 DELA070 DELL ST2421L
Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC) Builds (Compare 4,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC) - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback