TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Laptop 17-cn2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 17-cn2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 899B
Memory4 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 01:07
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 62.2
1-Core 119
2-Core 221
73% 134 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 628
60% 495 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 64.9%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 899B) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 20.4
14% 19.5 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 1.1
6% 8.3 fps
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 11.4%
 Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00BH1 512GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 95 83 76 71 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 663
Write 400
Mixed 394
SusWrite 88.9
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 19.6
82% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 654
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 69.5
140% 298 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 75.1%
 Great: 217%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Kingston HP32D4S2S1MR-4 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.9% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 26.9
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 79.9%
 Great: 80%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 8 60 17.3" 1280 720 AUOF992
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Laptop 17-cn2xxx Builds (Compare 254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 17-cn2xxx

CPU
Core i5-1235UIntelBench 60%, 8,532 samples197x
Core i7-1255UIntelBench 65%, 11,564 samples45x
Core i3-1215UIntelBench 65%, 3,625 samples12x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 13%, 18,007 samples238x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 10%, 2,559 samples12x
GeForce MX550NvidiaBench 29%, 507 samples3x
SSD
KIOXIA 512GBKbg50znv512gBench 170%, 1,846 samples54x
MZVLQ512HBLU-00BH1 512GBSamsungBench 130%, 3,023 samples47x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 156%, 9,997 samples27x
RAM
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 88%, 37,566 samples38x
M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 26,749 samples23x
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples20x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback