Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E5-575

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '23 at 22:52
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Memory 22.8
1-Core 58.3
2-Core 80.5
30% 53.9 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 129
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 5.8
5% 5.17 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 6.3
5% 6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00BH1 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 153 172 151 170 184 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 736
Write 633
Mixed 608
SusWrite 168
120% 536 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 10.7
47% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 192
133% 168 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 219%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 14 9.5 11 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DERLAR 16GB 3200MHz 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.1
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 300
13% 300 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575 Builds (Compare 970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback