HP ProBook 450 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 450 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8AA1
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230324
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 20:48
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Memory 30.6
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 169
49% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 305
30% 243 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8AA1) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 8.7
6% 7.3 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 4.9
6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SM2P41C8-256GC 256GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 307 309 302 296 354 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 594
Write 397
Mixed 448
SusWrite 306
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 12.1
49% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 34.7
DQ Mixed 84.5
71% 107 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 212%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 15.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 7
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 251
16% 251 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 20 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD071E
Typical ProBook 450 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 450 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $139
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback