Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712EA_K712EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712EA_K712EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X712EA
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '23 at 05:16
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 67
1-Core 131
2-Core 261
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 640
66% 534 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1822) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4824
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 23.4
16% 21.7 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 0.2
5% 6.77 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 155 124 142 141 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 904
Write 193
Mixed 187
SusWrite 141
77% 356 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 34.4
126% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 239
194% 284 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 212%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE PNY Inc M4S08S681QMMM52-12 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.3% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 15.4
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 26" 1920 1057 VIZ0000 D43fx-F4
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712EA_K712EA Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712EA_K712EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback