Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712EA_K712EA

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712EA_K712EA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X712EA
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230621
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '23 at 08:14
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1135G7 36,962 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Memory 35.2 1-Core 124 2-Core 247 68% 135 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 559 63% 493 Pts	64-Core 540 33% 540 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 1822) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 18 Reflection 18.7 Parallax 21.1 15% 19.3 fps	MRender 16.3 Gravity 24.5 Splatting 14.4 15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB 561 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7101Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 150 135 147 154 161 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 549 Write 186 Mixed 152 SusWrite 150 57% 259 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 56.8 4K Mixed 18.5 78% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 393 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 227 173% 242 MB/s
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 212%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE PNY Inc M4S08S681QMMM52-12 16GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 11.5 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 8.1 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 226 18% 226 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	59	60	26"	1920 1080	VIZ0000 D43fx-F4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712EA_K712EA Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712EA_K712EA

CPU
Core i3-1115G4IntelBench 51%, 18,815 samples	55x
Core i5-1135G7IntelBench 69%, 36,962 samples	55x
Core i7-1165G7IntelBench 66%, 51,565 samples	35x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	90x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples	57x

SSD
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBNvmeBench 156%, 561 samples	46x
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBNvmeBench 117%, 2,488 samples	34x
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1002 1TBNvmeBench 182%, 1,280 samples	25x

RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	75x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GBSamsungBench 62%, 1,848 samples	15x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GBSamsungBench 73%, 829 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369