Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712EA_K712EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712EA_K712EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X712EA
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230621
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 04 '23 at 15:24
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 67
1-Core 145
2-Core 263
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 459
52% 409 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1822) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4669
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 19.4
Parallax 19.5
12% 18 fps
MRender 19.5
Gravity 25
Splatting 0.3
11% 14.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 132 150 164 186 199 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 924
Write 147
Mixed 261
SusWrite 165
81% 374 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 36.7
131% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 174
167% 270 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 102%
Great: 212%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE PNY Inc M4S08S681QMMM52-12 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
71.5% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 21.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 17.5
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 25 4 60 26" 1280 720 VIZ0000 D43fx-F4
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712EA_K712EA Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712EA_K712EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback