Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 22.3 1-Core 101 2-Core 151 47% 91.4 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 322 36% 281 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1854 0327) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	5.9% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 6.4 5% 4.9 fps	MRender 9 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 9.5 7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.9% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-00000 256GB 3,055 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT2300Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 180 181 192 188 197 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 373 Write 337 Mixed 335 SusWrite 191 69% 309 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 52 4K Mixed 28.5 93% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 324 248% 336 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD MEM-DOWN 8GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2667, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 11.2 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 3.3 18% 6.37 GB/s	Latency 304 13% 304 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 70%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	58	60	15.5"	1536 864	LGD05A8

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	5x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	5x

SSD
MZNLN256HAJQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 89%, 3,055 samples	4x
PC SA530 SDASN8Y256G1009 256GBWDCBench 76%, 71 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD MEM-DOWN 8GBSamsungBench 57%, 22 samples	4x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK MEM-DOWN 8GBHynixBench 59%, 18 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16