Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics8.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FJ
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '22 at 10:02
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Memory 39
1-Core 15.5
2-Core 30.6
20% 28.4 Pts
4-Core 53
8-Core 97.6
9% 75.3 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX230
Asus(1043 1851) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2698
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
8.3% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 10.6
8% 9.43 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 10.7
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.3%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.6.C2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 565
Write 664
Mixed 527
131% 585 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 16.1
50% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 96.4
DQ Write 90.6
DQ Mixed 87.5
67% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 240%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
348GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 132 125 137 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 83.7
Write 133
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 133
73% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
202% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8A76 LD4AS008G-H2666GST 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
28.8% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 8.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 6
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback