Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	8.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512FJ
Memory	7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210201
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '22 at 10:02
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	LKA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Memory 39 1-Core 15.5 2-Core 30.6 20% 28.4 Pts	4-Core 53 8-Core 97.6 9% 75.3 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX230 6,801 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 1851) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2698 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	8.3% Terrible	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 7.6 Parallax 10.6 8% 9.43 fps	MRender 9.6 Gravity 10.4 Splatting 10.7 8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.3% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB 12,615 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.6.C2 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 565 Write 664 Mixed 527 131% 585 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 22.1 4K Mixed 16.1 50% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 96.4 DQ Write 90.6 DQ Mixed 87.5 67% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 240%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 348GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 132 125 137 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 83.7 Write 133 Mixed 50.6 SusWrite 133 73% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.6 202% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8A76 LD4AS008G-H2666GST 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2400, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 8.9 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 6 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 207 19% 207 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 50: 8R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
50%	17%	70	72	31	60	15.5"	1536 864	BOE07F1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	104x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	85x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	129x
GeForce MX230NvidiaBench 10%, 6,801 samples	60x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $45Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	13x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 57%, 4,156 samples	7x
WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GBWDCBench 43%, 30,897 samples	7x

RAM
AM1P24HC8T1-BBJS 1x8GBAdataBench 39%, 284 samples	45x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBHynixBench 57%, 26,973 samples	19x
M471A1K44BM0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GBSamsungBench 51%, 66 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $45

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $310	Nvidia RTX 3060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $225	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16