Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FJ
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '22 at 09:55
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Memory 40.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 187
58% 109 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 208
22% 175 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1851) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.07% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 3.8
3% 7.9 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.07%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.6.C2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 989
Write 709
Mixed 753
181% 817 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 30.8
108% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 110
127% 219 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 240%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
348GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 135 135 136 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 119
Write 143
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 135
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
230% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8A76 LD4AS008G-H2666GST 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
25.5% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 7.9
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback