Gigabyte GA-B650M GAMING X AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics304% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650M GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230816
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 02:14
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 192
2-Core 371
117% 219 Pts
4-Core 722
8-Core 1246
119% 984 Pts
64-Core 1,728
107% 1,728 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 114%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$930
Asus(1043 88C9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Lighting 461
Reflection 432
Parallax 457
376% 450 fps
MRender 560
Gravity 372
Splatting 268
312% 400 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 304%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,265
Write 2,259
Mixed 1,484
446% 2,003 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 83.3
293% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,739
DQ Write 1,517
DQ Mixed 1,595
1,204% 1,617 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 282
Mixed 345
82% 373 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 57.1
201% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 232
214% 327 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$280
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 493
Write 453
Mixed 428
102% 458 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 59.7
207% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 366
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 128%
Team TM8FP6002T 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: VC0S036I
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,688
Write 1,512
Mixed 1,214
327% 1,471 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 59.1
219% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 740
DQ Write 1,011
DQ Mixed 905
676% 885 MB/s
Poor: 154% Great: 345%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U5200C3816G-DCLAR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
179% Outstanding
MC Read 76.3
MC Write 57.6
MC Mixed 61.8
186% 65.2 GB/s
SC Read 58.2
SC Write 58.8
SC Mixed 54.3
163% 57.1 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 179%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 34.8" 3440 1440 SAM72F2 Odyssey G8
Typical GA-B650M GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 257%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650M GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,076
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback