Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6502ZC_K6502ZC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6502ZC_K6502ZC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K6502ZC
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren, 2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 09:34
Run Duration343 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 65.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 316
92% 177 Pts
4-Core 628
8-Core 932
97% 780 Pts
64-Core 1,270
79% 1,270 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU010TZ 1TB
507GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 635 179 176 54 52 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1829
Write 1,130
Mixed 1,060
SusWrite 188
233% 1,052 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 56
188% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 594
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 542
383% 491 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 164%
Great: 387%
Seagate Backup+ SL 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: A905
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 78 79 77 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 91.8
Write 60.1
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 78.2
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAB2GS6CMR6N-XN Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FF 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 34.7
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 21.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 0" 1280 720
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6502ZC_K6502ZC Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6502ZC_K6502ZC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback