Lenovo 21AH00CSMX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 21AH00CSMX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21AH00CSMX
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '23 at 06:12
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 70.2
1-Core 131
2-Core 309
88% 170 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 868
85% 695 Pts
64-Core 945
58% 945 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 22E8) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 25.4
18% 23.9 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 19.1
19% 23.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GDE9X081N 512GB
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41730C20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,929
Write 1102
Mixed 1,065
301% 1,366 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 53.7
178% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 563
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 506
342% 425 MB/s
Poor: 100% Great: 328%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAB2GS6CMR6N-XN Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FF 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 35.4
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 24.9
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 21AH00CSMX Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 21AH00CSMX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback