Lanix Neuron X Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLanix Neuron X Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardLanix Lanix de America
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateSep 05 '23 at 19:58
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 62.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 228
76% 140 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 462
56% 430 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1E50 800D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3889
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 19.7
Parallax 16.4
12% 16.8 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 12.8
13% 15.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S500 512GB
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0807A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 19 319 62 177 214 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 412
Write 340
Mixed 300
SusWrite 160
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 10.6
48% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 24.4
64% 130 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6B1 Kimtigo (HK) Limited KT4GS4NE8 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51% Above average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 18.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 9.4
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 14 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14FF
Typical Neuron X Pro Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lanix Neuron X Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback