Https://www.chn-ipc.com/ CML02

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHttps://www.chn-ipc.com/ CML02  (all builds)
Motherboardhttps://www.chn-ipc.com/ CML02
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 17:41
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 94.7
1-Core 129
2-Core 245
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 591
64% 506 Pts
64-Core 732
45% 732 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
4.3% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 7.8
5% 7.5 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 0.2
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.3%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S500 512GB
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0524A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 434 440 438 441 440 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 443
Mixed 429
SusWrite 436
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 23.5
146% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 35.1
89% 183 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GJN NB 16G 2666 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CML02 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Https://www.chn-ipc.com/ CML02

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback