MSI GL75 Leopard

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI GL75 Leopard  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MS-17E7
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 12:57
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 47
2-Core 151
47% 85.5 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 337
36% 285 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 89%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1032 512GB
449GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21111000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 512 272 303 321 338 352 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 1,081
Write 1169
Mixed 846
SusWrite 350
193% 861 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 39.4
139% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 661
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 484
368% 504 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 130%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 16.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E7 Builds (Compare 1,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: MSI GL75 Leopard - $1,200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,200
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback