Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics78.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory42.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '23 at 22:37
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 158
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 493
46% 385 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1533 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.5% Very good
Lighting 97.9
Reflection 112
Parallax 113
80% 108 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 98.3
Splatting 86.3
76% 93.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$44
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 337 316 315 308 292 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 335
Mixed 305
SusWrite 318
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 40.7
150% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 256
220% 326 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 128%
Ct480bx5 0 480GB
343GB free
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 91 90 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 289
Write 138
Mixed 115
SusWrite 91.3
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 14.3
62% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 25
51% 103 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 83%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
21GB free
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 69 64 64 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 214
Write 119
Mixed 162
SusWrite 69.1
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 31.6
118% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 85.3
DQ Write 94.2
DQ Mixed 95.1
70% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53%
Great: 73%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
173GB free
Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1273 975 978 979 995 983 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,588
Write 1,577
Mixed 1,276
SusWrite 1,031
307% 1,368 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 52.4
164% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 579
422% 555 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 202%
Great: 297%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
952GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 88 89 92 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 159
Write 106
Mixed 72
SusWrite 88.4
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
2TB free, PID ab30
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 111 110 109 108 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 131
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 109
141% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMY16GX3M2C1866C1 CMY16GX3M2C1866C1 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 48GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 37.7
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 240 24.1" 1920 1080 SAM100A LC27RG50
Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $942
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback