Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory43 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '23 at 22:53
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 213
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 672
69% 555 Pts
64-Core 820
51% 820 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1543 MHz, MLim: 1857 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.6% Very good
Lighting 98.9
Reflection 112
Parallax 99.3
81% 103 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 98.3
Splatting 90.7
78% 95.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct480bx5 0 480GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 51 77 90 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 343
Write 145
Mixed 195
SusWrite 78
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 0.3
41% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 14.9
DQ Mixed 0.3
21% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 83%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
180GB free
Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1220 966 979 985 986 986 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,936
Write 1,658
Mixed 1,542
SusWrite 1,021
345% 1,539 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 50.6
164% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 644
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 445
337% 462 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 212%
Great: 297%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
21GB free
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 91 88 92 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 260
Write 116
Mixed 158
SusWrite 88.8
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 31.7
107% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 86.8
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 90.3
72% 98.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 73%
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$44
162GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 460 416 344 345 348 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 448
Mixed 424
SusWrite 395
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 48.5
154% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 356
259% 340 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 106%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
956GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 90 107 95 89 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 171
Write 125
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 94
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76%
Great: 114%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
2TB free, PID ab30
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 108 111 111 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 103
Mixed 77
SusWrite 109
132% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
173% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMY16GX3M2C1866C1 CMY16GX3M2C1866C1 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 48GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 33.6
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $942
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback