Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory43 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '23 at 12:23
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 106
2-Core 222
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 661
64% 529 Pts
64-Core 805
50% 805 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1543 MHz, MLim: 1847 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.5% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 114
Parallax 105
82% 106 fps
MRender 97.9
Gravity 99.3
Splatting 91.5
78% 96.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$44
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 371 370 369 370 370 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 436
Mixed 336
SusWrite 369
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 38.2
134% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 270
226% 327 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 128%
Ct480bx5 0 480GB
348GB free
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 91 91 90 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 352
Write 160
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 86.5
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 0.3
41% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 0.4
24% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 83%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
21GB free
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 88 78 93 92 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 261
Write 116
Mixed 158
SusWrite 86.7
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 32.8
113% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 86
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 92.9
73% 98.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 73%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
164GB free
Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1301 997 991 986 986 984 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,985
Write 1,939
Mixed 1,662
SusWrite 1,041
372% 1,656 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 52.5
171% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 468
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 430
313% 410 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 214%
Great: 297%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
956GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 89 90 90 90 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 172
Write 120
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 92.7
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
2TB free, PID ab30
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 108 110 111 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 84.4
Write 93.9
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 108
129% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
193% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMY16GX3M2C1866C1 CMY16GX3M2C1866C1 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 48GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 39.4
122% 42.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $942
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback