Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory42 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '23 at 21:54
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 226
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 704
69% 566 Pts
64-Core 875
54% 875 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1533 MHz, MLim: 1842 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79% Very good
Lighting 98
Reflection 113
Parallax 104
80% 105 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 99.4
Splatting 89.1
77% 95.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct480bx5 0 480GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 87 88 83 84 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 363
Write 152
Mixed 207
SusWrite 85.2
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 18
81% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 43.6
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 0.3
7% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 83%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
180GB free
Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1249 987 986 991 987 984 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2,019
Write 1,779
Mixed 1,624
SusWrite 1,031
362% 1,613 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 55.1
179% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 713
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 479
367% 508 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 223%
Great: 297%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
21GB free
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 97 97 96 97 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 456
Write 123
Mixed 175
SusWrite 94.9
46% 212 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 33.4
117% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 87
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 89.9
71% 97.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 73%
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$44
137GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 464 421 309 346 345 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 461
Mixed 443
SusWrite 391
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 48.9
166% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 365
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 112%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
956GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 92 91 95 94 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 174
Write 117
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 92
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 114%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
2TB free, PID ab30
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 109 109 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 83.5
Write 111
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 109
132% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
174% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMY16GX3M2C1866C1 CMY16GX3M2C1866C1 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 48GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 34.9
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $942
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback