Thunderobot 911AirX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemThunderobot 911AirX  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT NLAK
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '23 at 19:19
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 70.7
1-Core 168
2-Core 341
100% 193 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 887
92% 743 Pts
64-Core 1,157
72% 1,157 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Quanta(152D 1384) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 76.6
Parallax 13.6
10% 33.9 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 14.1
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-8D512 512GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EV22102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1499 1452 1526 1465 1656 627 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 2,002
Write 1,341
Mixed 1,091
SusWrite 1,371
324% 1,451 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 40.4
213% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,240
DQ Write 832
DQ Mixed 748
636% 940 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 272%
Great: 319%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 36.3
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 23.5
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0910
Typical 911AirX Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Thunderobot 911AirX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback