PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO P520 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3220-A1 |
Memory | 5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20140306 |
Uptime | 4.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 01 '23 at 17:58 |
Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$88
HP(103C 8338) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$80
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 423 372 294 268 289 MB/s
|
94.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
20.5%
Poor
|
||||
70GB free
Firmware: 010A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 68 67 66 66 MB/s
|
45.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 57 | 60 | 23.5" | 1280 720 | SAM0B65 S24D390 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 43x |
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 42x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 23x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 48x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $88Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 20x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $228 |