Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte Z390 GAMING X
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 14:10
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 147
2-Core 293
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 1,017
94% 787 Pts
64-Core 1,144
71% 1,144 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
156% Outstanding
Lighting 235
Reflection 212
Parallax 205
191% 217 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 152
Splatting 135
130% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 156%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 140 103 79 78 78 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 490
Write 146
Mixed 212
SusWrite 101
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 4.6
56% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 129%
BT58SSD13S 1TB
361GB free
Firmware: S0110A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 137 144 145 145 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 480
Write 144
Mixed 213
SusWrite 141
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 15.9
67% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 13.6
DQ Mixed 20.5
28% 54.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 98%
PNY CS2130 1TB SSD
224GB free
Firmware: CS213530
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 178 225 198 166 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 87.8
Write 1,666
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 164
115% 498 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 4.3
64% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 498
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 163
162% 268 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 298%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/16GX 029E CMK16GX4M1D3000C16 32GB
3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 30.2
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 42.6
SC Mixed 27.7
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 54.4
74% 54.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F32 BenQ XL2411Z
Typical GA-Z390 GAMING X-CF Builds (Compare 12,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $802
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback