Asus PRIME B560M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B560M-A  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori, 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 15:43
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600KF-$178
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 166
2-Core 321
104% 192 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 934
98% 787 Pts
64-Core 1,152
71% 1,152 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 20.4
17% 19.5 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 16.4
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GMTE220S 512GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A7T36A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 501 522 517 525 486 174 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,918
Write 520
Mixed 636
SusWrite 454
193% 882 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 57.2
239% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 385
305% 416 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 196%
Great: 318%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
396GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 9.2 11 13 14 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 462
Write 27.2
Mixed 14
SusWrite 11.6
27% 129 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 7.07 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 100%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
310GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 110 110 110 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 86.5
Write 94.2
Mixed 93
SusWrite 109
71% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 76%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
93GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 116 115 116 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 109
Write 111
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 115
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
77GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 135 135 136 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 108
Write 116
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 135
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 85%
Asmedia ASM105x 500GB
230GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 59 59 60 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 74.8
Write 78
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 58.5
47% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 73%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
3TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 109 109 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
47% Average
Read 147
Write 147
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 108
135% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
38% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47%
Great: 53%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB
563GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 32
Write 32.3
Mixed 29
SusWrite 38.3
45% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 21%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 111 117 113 110 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 134
Write 94.8
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 110
112% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM2666HLE-32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (84th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 30.3
96% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 28.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM08B3 S24B300
Typical PRIME B560M-A Builds (Compare 8,076 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B560M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback