Asus PRIME B560M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B560M-A  (all builds)
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori, 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 10:25
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600KF-$178
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 90
1-Core 170
2-Core 336
107% 199 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 1,051
102% 839 Pts
64-Core 1212
75% 1212 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 21.8
16% 19.7 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 16.3
16% 20.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GMTE220S 512GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A7T36A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 192 280 521 525 526 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,951
Write 537
Mixed 590
SusWrite 423
191% 875 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 55.9
241% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 371
296% 407 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 196%
Great: 318%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
396GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 272 421 414 425 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46% Average
Read 438
Write 382
Mixed 369
SusWrite 287
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 0.3
25% 7.87 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 14.7
DQ Mixed 0.3
24% 63.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46%
Great: 100%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
316GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 102 102 103 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 96
Write 98.7
Mixed 76
SusWrite 101
69% 93 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 76%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
98GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 115 117 115 115 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 82.2
Write 85.5
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 114
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
179% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
83GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 136 136 138 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 99.5
Write 100
Mixed 54
SusWrite 136
71% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 85%
Asmedia ASM105x 500GB
232GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 157
Write 17.8
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 78.3
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 73%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
3TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 117 117 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 146
Write 145
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 116
138% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 53%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB
565GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 52.5
Write 32.2
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 36.7
47% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 21%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 111 111 111 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 138
Write 136
Mixed 20
SusWrite 110
130% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM2666HLE-32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (88th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
95.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 32.2
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 30.2
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 30 23.5" 1280 720 SAM08B3 S24B300
Typical PRIME B560M-A Builds (Compare 8,076 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B560M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback