Asus PRIME B560M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B560M-A  (all builds)
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori, 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 15:34
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600KF-$178
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 168
2-Core 335
106% 197 Pts
4-Core 647
8-Core 976
101% 812 Pts
64-Core 1,230
76% 1,230 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 17
Parallax 19.9
16% 19 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 22
Splatting 16.3
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GMTE220S 512GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A7T36A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 513 519 525 292 239 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,771
Write 512
Mixed 574
SusWrite 428
180% 821 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 46.5
202% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 519
DQ Mixed 374
295% 402 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 176%
Great: 318%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
396GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 431 436 437 447 449 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
316GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 96.5
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 101
72% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 76%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
98GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 116 115 115 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 82
Write 81.7
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 115
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
83GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 135 136 138 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 99
Write 97.3
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 136
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 85%
Asmedia ASM105x 500GB
232GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 79 80 79 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 153
Write 18
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 78.2
57% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 73%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
3TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 117 117 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 146
Write 144
Mixed 21
SusWrite 117
138% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 53%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB
565GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 53.2
Write 31.5
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 36.1
47% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 21%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 111 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 140
Write 137
Mixed 20
SusWrite 111
131% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM2666HLE-32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 31.6
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 24.7
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 30 23.5" 1280 720 SAM08B3 S24B300
Typical PRIME B560M-A Builds (Compare 8,098 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B560M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $406
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback