Lenovo 90L300BMMW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90L300BMMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3704
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '23 at 12:29
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 142
2-Core 286
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 969
94% 770 Pts
64-Core 967
60% 967 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Zotac(19DA C530) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.6% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 105
Parallax 108
90% 108 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 95.9
Splatting 90
86% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,176
Write 1,905
Mixed 1,469
411% 1,850 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 64.7
209% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,373
DQ Write 1,165
DQ Mixed 1,258
946% 1,266 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
Kingston SKC6001024G 1TB
38GB free
Firmware: S4500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 407 420 438 440 436 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 429
Mixed 384
SusWrite 399
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 47.1
153% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 272
219% 310 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 24.4
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 20.7
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 0P 4R 6G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 35% 37 495 360 120 27" 1920 1080 AUS27AD VG278
Typical 90L300BMMW Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

System: Lenovo 90L300BMMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback