Lenovo 90L300BMMW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90L300BMMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3704
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 12:51
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 967
94% 769 Pts
64-Core 975
60% 975 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Zotac(19DA C530) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 4100 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.5% Very good
Lighting 125
Reflection 118
Parallax 20.8
102% 87.8 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 32.8
15% 16.6 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,882
Write 1,685
Mixed 1,470
374% 1,679 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 60.9
197% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 1,217
DQ Write 868
DQ Mixed 1,022
769% 1,036 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
Kingston SKC6001024G 1TB
68GB free
Firmware: S4500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 411 404 422 440 438 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 427
Mixed 393
SusWrite 388
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 45.5
147% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 272
220% 311 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
86% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 24.5
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 25.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90L300BMMW Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

System: Lenovo 90L300BMMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback