Lenovo 90L300BMMW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics95% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90L300BMMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3704
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 12:47
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 145
2-Core 288
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 961
93% 767 Pts
64-Core 971
60% 971 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Zotac(19DA C530) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3950 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 108
Parallax 114
96% 114 fps
MRender 153
Gravity 102
Splatting 93.2
92% 116 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,212
Write 1,903
Mixed 1,483
415% 1,866 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 61
197% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1225
DQ Write 869
DQ Mixed 1,009
764% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
Kingston SKC6001024G 1TB
68GB free
Firmware: S4500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 399 415 431 289 435 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 433
Mixed 394
SusWrite 365
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 45.3
147% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 271
219% 310 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 24.6
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 26
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90L300BMMW Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

System: Lenovo 90L300BMMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback