Intel HM570

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel HM570  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '23 at 07:39
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 158
2-Core 312
99% 185 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 943
95% 771 Pts
64-Core 1,355
84% 1,355 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.5% Average
Lighting 10
Reflection 0.2
Parallax 190
8% 66.6 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 152
Splatting 134
127% 158 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Reletech P600 M.2 PCIE3.0 1TB
615GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10660 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2176 2224 2349 2351 445 286 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 848
Write 288
Mixed 398
SusWrite 1,639
179% 793 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 52.3
227% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 858
DQ Write 983
DQ Mixed 916
692% 919 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 243%
Great: 313%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
169GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 222 206 210 209 208 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 480
Mixed 379
SusWrite 231
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 42.9
158% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 257
216% 313 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 111%
Kingston SA400S37 480G 480GB
26GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 315 321 200 79 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 366
Write 312
Mixed 269
SusWrite 207
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 31.4
117% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 80.6
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 108
96% 140 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 105%
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
169GB free
Firmware: EDFK0N01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1152 1123 446 174 157 563 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,308
Write 1608
Mixed 1,383
SusWrite 603
276% 1,225 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 64
229% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,329
DQ Write 1,194
DQ Mixed 1290
960% 1271 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 216%
Great: 244%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
466GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 119 122 122 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 126
Write 116
Mixed 77
SusWrite 120
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JAD3200U1816 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 35.7
111% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 27.1
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 0P 1R 3G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 14% 104 540 451 144 23.8" 1920 1080 VSC623B VX2418-P FHD
History: Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B | Score 25: 0P 1R 3G 11B
Typical HM570 Builds (Compare 860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel HM570

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback