AZW Speed S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAZW Speed S  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW Speed S
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '23 at 19:30
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8109U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
61% Good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 55.1
2-Core 145
59% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 200
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.14% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 8
Parallax 11.3
8% 9.77 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 9.8
8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.14%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8J41100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 654 308 596 542 702 573 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 1,050
Write 144
Mixed 683
SusWrite 562
135% 610 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 19.5
86% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 141
101% 130 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS632A.M4FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (91st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.9% Good
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 44.2
MC Mixed 18
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Speed S Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: AZW Speed S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback