Gigabyte GA-B150M-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemGigabyte B150M-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B150M-HD3  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime12.1 Days
Run DateJul 28 '23 at 14:02
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 183
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 313
38% 290 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2077 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.1% Above average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 63
53% 66.1 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 63.1
53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 88 86 41 22 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 437
Write 386
Mixed 366
SusWrite 98.9
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
463GB free
Firmware: GG2OAF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 90 95 94 90 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 58%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
317GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 34 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 54.5
Write 33.4
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 35.1
43% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD1 029E CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
65.5% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.4
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 0P 5R 5G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 44% 25 210 59 60 23.8" 1920 1080 LEN62B6 E24-28
Typical GA-B150M-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150M-HD3 - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback